Are economic agents (consumers) truly foresighted in their decision Essay

Are economic agents (consumers) truly foresighted in their decision making - Essay Example Negative feedback refers to the feedback signal that is 180 degrees out of phase with respect to that of the input signal. Generally, negative feedback can be divided into two: voltage feedback and current feedback. As often is the case, the current feedback is applied purposely to reduce the input amplifier. However, there are cases where both feedbacks may exist in a circuit. In such a case, both current voltage would be feedback towards the input in parallel or series. This, therefore, imply that the feedback would be represented as series-voltage feedback, series-current feedback, shunt current feedback, and shunt- voltage feedback. Arguably, negative feedback makes a gain in a circuit to be stable. Mathematically, it can be shown that A1= AB + A/1. It is worth noting that the negative feedback is a very useful principle that finds its application in an operation amplifier. It has been cited as being the best in creating the practical circuits due to its characteristic nature of being able to set rates, gains, alongside other significant parameters. Moreover, the negative feedback can make the circuits self-correcting and stable. By and large, the fundamental principle of the negative feedback is such that the output drives in such a direction creating an equilibrium condition. For an op-amp circuit without a feedback, there is lacking a corrective mechanism. The output voltage shall become saturated with a tiniest amount of the differential voltage that is applied in the in). It has also been noted that negative feedback will make a gain in a circuit to be stable. Moreover, research has it that the negative feedback is a fundamental principle as far as the operation of an amplifier is concerned. This is based on the fact that it can be used in creating practical circuits given its characteristic of setting up rates, gains, alongside other significant parameters. Thus, an op-amp circuit without

William Shakespeare and his play Richard II Essay

William Shakespeare and his play Richard II - Essay Example Accordingly, principal excerpts from this historical play are: firstly, King Richard II's: 'Nay, if I turn mine eyes upon myself, I find myself a traitor with the rest; For I have given here my soul's consent To undeck the pompous body of a king; Made glory base and sovereignty a slave, Proud majesty a subject, state a peasant' (Bate, 2010); secondly, also Richard's: 'Exton, thy fierce hand Hath with the king's blood stain'd the king's own land' (Bate, 2010); thirdly, Exton's: 'As full of valour as of royal blood †¦ This dead king to the living king I'll bear Take hence the rest, and give them burial here' (Bate, 2010); then, Henry Bolingbroke's: 'Exton, I thank thee not; for thou hast wrought A deed of slander with thy fatal hand Upon my head and all this famous land' (Bate, 2010); finally, also Bolingbroke's: 'Though I did wish him dead, I hate the murderer, love him murdered. †¦ Lords, I protest, my soul is full off woe, That blood should sprinkle me to make me grow: Com e, mourn with me for that I do lament, And put on sullen black incontinent: I'll make a vayage to the Holy Land, To wish this blood off from my guilty hand' (Bate, 2010). Further on, all these excerpts' meaning will be revealed according to the question and the overall meaning of the play. To understand these excerpts properly, we need to pick up few relevant actions from the synopsis. Specifically, Henry Bolingbroke was a Richard's cousin, disputing with Thomas Mowbray in the beginning of the play. Afterwards, they both were banished by the king; when John de Gaunt, Boligbroke's father, died, Richard injustly seized de Gaunt's land. Nevertheless, Bolingbroke returned secretly, while king was administering the war with Ireland. In fact, he and his supporters won the civil war against Richard (scenes before Wales' coast and in the Flint castle), and deprived king from his land, throne of England, and even his own life (at Pomfret's scene). According to this dramaturgy, we would answe r given question from 'The King's Two Bodies' perspective, concerning not only his natural and politic / spiritual body, but also a rising of the Machivellian king, Henry Bolingbroke. Then, we will discuss two different blocks within given question: whether Bolingbroke and his supporters were justified in taking the throne from King Richard; what was lost and what was gained concerning Richard's actions as king and Boligbroke's actions once he seized power. Answering these blocks we will be pedominantly focused on excerpts stated above. Primarily, Henry Bolingbroke and his supporters, Northumberland and Percy, were not fully justified in taking the throne from Richard, because Richard remained as legal king even being impisoned after revolution. Bolingbroke was Richard's cousin, and very magnificent and successful leader of nobles' party, but still the previous king became an opportunity for the loyalists to restore their power. Moreover, in the medieval ages political situation wit h two kings --- old and new --- was often instable, due to a fact that if almighty God only himself ruled the universe, this meant that king by only himself must have been governed the English land (Richard's 'thy fierce hand Hath with the king's blood stain'd the king's own land' (Bate, 2010)), i.e. according to the medieval assumptions on the nature of royal power in the society, king had two bodies: